back to: Safety & SecuritySafety & Security
Hazardous Materials
HM Topics
Regulations
HMSP Program
Cargo Tank Safety
Training & Education
Security
Spill Reporting & Prevention
State HM Programs
HM FAQs
Publications
Reports
Brochures
 
  
 

Appendix A. Detailed Scenario Descriptions

Introduction

The detailed scenario descriptions look in depth at all four scenarios and act as a reference to this document. Additional information can be found in the Concept of Operations document. Information for each scenario included the following:

  • Hazmat class description, as well as route and delivery information
  • Participant information of shippers, trucking companies and consignees
  • Technologies tested by truck
  • FOT operational information.

In addition to the above information, details on the public sector reporting center are also listed within the scenario descriptions.

A.1 Scenario 1 - Bulk Fuel Delivery

Dupre Transport (1a) provided 13 short haul fuel delivery vehicles, delivering Class 3 (Flammable Liquids). Deliveries were made in roughly a 100 mile radius of Houston, TX, Dallas, TX., San Antonio, TX., and Austin, TX. The technologies installed per truck are listed later in Table A-1.

Scenario (1b) with Cox Petroleum provided 12 short haul fuel delivery vehicles, delivering Class 3 (Flammable Liquids) in the southern and central California region ranging from San Diego north through the Bay Area to Sacramento on the north. The technologies installed per truck are listed later in Table A-2.

A.1.1 Participants

ScenarioVehiclesShipperCarrierConsigneePublic Sector Agencies
1a13ExxonMobilDupre TransportVariousTexas Department of Public Safety
1b12ExxonMobilCox PetroleumVariousCalifornia Highway Patrol

ExxonMobil markets gasoline and other fuels at almost 43,000 service stations in 118 countries and has over one million industrial and wholesale customers around the globe. The company has aviation facilities in more than 700 airports in 80 countries. ExxonMobil Marine Fuels serves more than 300 ports in 70 countries.

Dupre Transport, headquartered in Lafayette, LA, provides both bulk tank and dry van services to a variety of customers in the petrochemical industry. Typical products hauled by the bulk tank group include; gasoline, diesel, aviation fuels, crude oil, liquefied petroleum gas, and various types of petrochemicals. The company operates over 250 company-owned tractors within a network of approximately 25 terminal locations. Primary areas of operation are Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Alabama, but range as far as Florida, Minnesota, and New York.

Cox Petroleum Transport is a common carrier trucking company specializing in petroleum product transportation. It services the California market, hauling gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel, lube oils, crude oil, and fuel oils. Cox has eight terminals located throughout Central and Southern California. Leading customers include ARCO, Exxon Mobil and Chevron.

Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) for Dupre and the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for Cox tested state agency support.

Tested Technologies

The following technologies were tested in this scenario:

  • Wireless Satellite Communications (w/GPS)
  • Wireless Terrestrial Communications handheld w/pickup and delivery (P & D) software
  • Driver Authentication with Global Login
  • Intelligent Onboard Computers (OBC)
    • Wireless Vehicle Disabling
  • Panic Button in Dash
  • Panic Button Wireless/remote
    • Remote Vehicle Disabling
    • Remote Emergency Notification

A.1.2 Technologies by Truck

Tables A-1 and A-2 present the specific technologies that were installed on each of the 25 trucks that were tested in this scenario. The suite of technologies are mapped to the technology tier described earlier as well as the functional requirements that was addressed.

A.1.3 Operational Description of Scenario

Cox and Dupre had used the satellite system extensively before and during the actual FOT. They both use the system for positioning, daily messaging, and operations. Terrestrial communications were added to Cox and digital phones to Dupre to see how they would perform in the fuel delivery market.

Table A-1. Technologies per Truck on Scenario (1a)
TruckTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTierShipperCarrierFunctional Requirements
1Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBGlobal LoginWVDT-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
2Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBGlobal LoginWVDT-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
3Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
4Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
5Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
6Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
7Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
8Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
9Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
10Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
11Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
12Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
13Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonDupre1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4

Table A-2. Technologies per Truck on Scenario (1b)
TruckTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTierShipperCarrierFunctional Requirements
14Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal LoginOBCT-4ExxonCox1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.13,2.14,3.4
15Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal LoginOBCT-4ExxonCox1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.13,2.14,3.4
16Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal LoginOBCT-4ExxonCox1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.13,2.14,3.4
17Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonCox1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
18Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonCox1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
19Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3ExxonCox1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
20Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBGlobal LoginWVDT-3ExxonCox1.1,1.3,1.4, 2.1-2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14,3.4
21Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBGlobal LoginWVDT-3ExxonCox2.3,2.12,
22Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBGlobal LoginWVDT-3ExxonCox2.3,2.12,
23Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBGlobal LoginWVDT-3ExxonCox2.3,2.12,
24Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2ExxonCox2.3,2.12,
25Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2ExxonCox2.3,2.12,

Driver identification was performed with the Global Login feature that was new to both operations. The drivers had to login their username and password after each time the truck was started or had been disabled. This proved to be extensive in this operation.

Both carriers also had wired and wireless panic buttons installed in their tractors. The panic buttons were only used during on-site evaluations with the evaluators and during public agency testing with Texas DPS and California CHP. The Wireless Vehicle Disable (WVD) was also used during these controlled tests with the state agencies and evaluators in a controlled environment to disable the throttle of the tractor.

Lastly, Cox had onboard computers (OBC) installed on their tractors. The functionality of these OBC's for loss of signal disabling, and OTA disabling were tested on site at Cox in a controlled environment during CHP and evaluation testing.

A.2 Scenario 2 - LTL High Hazard

Scenario (2a) with Distribution Technologies involved 12 dedicated high hazard "LTL-like" type of vehicles. These vehicles are tanks with segregated partitions which carry up to seven different types of chemicals/hazards entailing seven stops per trip. Vehicles were dispatched out of Macon Georgia, and cover various southeast U.S. locations. The actual technologies installed per truck are listed later in Table A-3.

Scenario (2b) with Roadway Express involved 13 LTL Pick up and Delivery (P&D) type of vehicles. This part of the FOT monitored a lower cost (terrestrial hardware) technology installed on a national LTL fleet with a very high degree of integration and efficiencies. These trucks are dedicated for local P&D operations, usually without a dedicated driver, route or truck. The trucks provided were based out of San Diego, California, for the purposes of this test. The technologies that were installed per truck are listed later in Table A-4.

A.2.1 Participants

ScenarioVehiclesShipperCarrierConsigneePublic Sector Agencies
2a12GE BetzDistribution Technologies (DisTech)VariousNone
2b13GE BetzRoadway ExpressVariousNone

GE Betz is a global business with offices in more than 50 countries and operations throughout the world. It has four regional centers and 20 production plants located in North and South America, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and Latin America. GE Betz has approximately 3800 employees worldwide.

All former Hercules plants were acquired by GE Betz. The Hercules Macon Georgia plant also manufactures products for GE Betz.

Distribution Technologies is a provider of transportation, distribution, logistics, and supply chain management services through a combination of asset and non-asset based solutions.

Deliveries include DOE processing plants, power generating plants (both fossil fuel and nuclear), sensitive chemical production/distribution facilities, essential medical and health science facilities, municipal water treatment facilities, and ramp areas of military and commercial airports.

Roadway Express is a leading less-than-truckload (LTL) transporter of industrial, commercial, and retail goods in the two- to five-day regional and long-haul markets. Roadway Express provides service between all 50 states, Canada, Mexico, and Puerto Rico with international freight services for 140 countries. Roadway Express specializes in limited load deliveries in which a trailer usually contains cargo from several customers.

Technologies Tested

The following technologies were tested in this scenario.

  • Wireless Satellite Communications (w/GPS)
  • Wireless Terrestrial Communications
  • Driver Authentication with Global Login
  • Intelligent Onboard Computers (OBC)
    • Wireless Vehicle Disabling
  • Panic Button in Dash
  • Panic Button Wireless/Remote
    • Remote Vehicle Disabling
    • Remote Emergency Notification

A.2.2 Technologies by Truck

Tables A-3 and A-4 present the specific technologies that were installed on each of the 25 trucks that will be tested in this scenario. The suite of technologies are mapped to the technology tier described earlier as well as the functional requirements that were addressed.

Table A-3. Technologies per Truck on Scenario 2a
TruckTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTierShipperCarrierFunctional Requirements
26Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBGlobal Login T-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4,2.1,2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14
27Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBGlobal Login T-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4,2.1,2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14
28Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBGlobal Login T-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4,2.1,2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14
29Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBGlobal LoginWVDT-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4,2.1,2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14
30Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4,2.1,2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14
31Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4,2.1,2.3,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.14
32Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal LoginOBCT-4GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4,1.6,2.1,2.3,2.7,2.8,2.10,2.11,2.13,2.14,3.1
33Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4, 2.1, 2.3, 2.8, 2.10, 2.11, 2.14
34Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4, 2.1, 2.3, 2.8, 2.10, 2.11, 2.14
35Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4, 2.1, 2.3, 2.8, 2.10, 2.11, 2.14
36Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4, 2.1, 2.3, 2.8, 2.10, 2.11, 2.14
37Satellite Comm.Panic DashGlobal Login T-3GE BetzDisTech1.3,1.4, 2.1, 2.3, 2.8, 2.10, 2.11, 2.14

Table A-4. Technologies per Truck on Scenario 2b
TruckTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTierShipperCarrierFunctional Requirements
38Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
39Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
40Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
41Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
42Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
43Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
44Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
45Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
46Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
47Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
48Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
49Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11
50Terrestrial CommPanic Dash  T-2MultipleRodeway2.3, 2.8, 2.11

A.2.3 Operational Description of Scenario

Distribution Technology (DisTech) had used the satellite system extensively before and during the actual FOT. Roadway Express had used the terrestrial system extensively before the FOT but not in the new market of San Diego California. They both use the system for positioning, daily messaging, and operations.

Driver identification was performed with the Global Login feature for DisTech only in this scenario. The drivers had to login their username and password after each time the tractor was started or had been disabled.

DisTech also had wired and wireless panic buttons installed in their tractors. The panic buttons were only used during on site evaluations with the evaluators. The Wireless Vehicle Disable (WVD) was also used during these controlled tests with the evaluators in a controlled environment to disable the throttle of the tractor.

Lastly, DisTech had onboard computers (OBC) installed on their tractors. The functionality of these OBC's for loss of signal disabling, and OTA disabling were tested on site at DisTech in a controlled environment during the evaluation testing.

A.3 Scenario 3 - Bulk Other

Scenario (3a) with Transport Services involved 12 bulk chemical delivery vehicles, delivering hazmat Classes 9, 2, and 4, and D Ester. Routes originated in Midland Michigan and delivered to consignees in Illinois, Missouri, Indiana, and Ohio. The technologies installed per truck are listed later in Table A-5.

Scenario (3b) with (carrier) Quality Distribution involved seven bulk chemical delivery vehicles, delivering Class 3, Flammable, Class 2.2 Non-Flammable with an inhalation hazard. Routes originated in Lima Ohio and have consignees in Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Texas. The technologies installed per truck are listed later in Table A-6.

Scenario (3c) with (carrier) Roeder Cartage involved six bulk chemical delivery vehicles, delivering Acrylonitrile (AN), a Class 3, Flammable and Poisonous. Routes originated in Lima, Ohio and had consignees in Illinois and New York. The technologies installed per truck are listed later in Table A-7.

A.3.1 Participants

ScenarioVehiclesShipperCarrierConsigneePublic Sector Agencies
3a12DOW ChemicalTransport ServiceNuFarm AmericasIllinois State Police
3b7BP ChemicalQuality DistributionNoneNone
3c6BP ChemicalRoeder CartageEvans ChemicalNew York State Police

Dow Chemical is a leading science and technology company that provides innovative chemical, plastic, and agricultural products and services to many essential consumer markets. With annual sales of $28 billion, Dow serves customers in more than 170 countries and a wide range of markets that are vital to human progress, including food, transportation, health and medicine, personal and home care, and building and construction, among others. Dow has approximately 50,000 employees worldwide.

Transport Service is based in Hinsdale, IL and is the 16th largest tank truck carrier in the United States. It is also one of the leading independent tank truck carriers of sweetener products. TSC conducts its business through two separate divisions, Chemical and Food Grade. The Chemical Division provides tank truck carrier services to chemical manufacturers from seven terminals, while the Food Grade division focuses on serving manufacturers of bulk liquid food products from four terminals and five satellite locations.

NuFarm Americas was the consignee for Transport Services was in Chicago Heights, IL.

BP Chemical is the world's third largest petrochemicals company, based on a diverse, highly integrated product portfolio in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. BP Chemical manufactures and markets over 25 million tons of petrochemicals, intermediates, plastics, and specialties each year.

The BP Nitriles Business Unit's Lima facility is a major producer of industrial and agricultural chemical products and employees approximately 480 people. Their primary products include acrylonitrile, butanediol (BDO), Barex, and nitrogen. The Lima facility is one of BP Chemical's largest plant sites.

BP Chemical was the dedicated shipper for scenario 3b and 3c. They supplied both product and consignees to carriers Quality Distribution and Roeder Cartage.

Quality Distribution is the largest liquid bulk transportation company in the North American continent. Quality Carriers, Inc, is a subsidiary of Quality Distribution, Inc. Headquartered in Tampa, Florida, Quality Distribution operates approximately 3,400 tractors and 7,900 trailers through principal transportation subsidiaries: Quality Carriers, TransPlastics, and Quebec-based Levy Transport. Quality Distribution also holds varied business interests in other bulk transportation services, including tank cleaning and freight brokerage.

The Quality Distribution terminal in Lima, OH, is mostly dedicated to hauling loads for BP Chemical. There were no consignees involved in testing this scenario. Eli Lily as designated consignee, was unable to accommodate this test at the last moment.

Roeder Cartage, Inc. is based in Lima, OH and is a dedicated carrier for BP Chemical.

Roeder Cartage is a participant that has not adopted any vehicle communications technology. They were selected as the only "non-technology adopter" to participate in the FOT.

Evans Chemical of Waterloo, NY was the consignee in this scenario. Onsite state agency testing and evaluations were performed at the Evans facility.

New York State Police was the State agency support.

Technologies Tested

The following technologies that were tested in this scenario:

  • Wireless Satellite Communications (w/GPS)
  • Driver Authentication with Biometrics and Smart Cards
  • Electronic Supply Chain Manifest (ESCM)
  • Panic Button in Dash
  • Panic Button Wireless/remote
    • Remote Vehicle Disabling
    • Remote Emergency Notification

A.3.2 Technologies by Truck

Tables A-5, A-6, and A-7 present the specific technologies that were installed on each of the 25 trucks that were tested in this scenario. The suite of technologies are mapped to the technology tier described earlier as well as the functional requirements that were addressed.

Table A-5. Technologies per Truck on Scenario 3a
TruckTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTierShipperCarrierFunctional Requirements
51Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPB/WVDBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
52Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
53Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
54Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
55Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
56Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
57Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
58Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
59Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
60Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
61Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
62Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4DowTransport Service1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4

Table A-6. Technologies per Truck on Scenario 3b
TruckTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTierShipperCarrierFunctional Requirements
63Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPB/WVDBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPQuality Distribution1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
64Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPB/WVDBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPQuality Distribution1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
65Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPQuality Distribution1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
66Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPQuality Distribution1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
67Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPQuality Distribution1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
68Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPQuality Distribution1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
69Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPQuality Distribution1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4

Table A-7. Technologies per Truck on Scenario 3c
TruckTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTierShipperCarrierFunctional Requirements
70Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPB/WVDBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPRoeder Cartage1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
71Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPB/WVDBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPRoeder Cartage1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
72Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPRoeder Cartage1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
73Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPRoeder Cartage1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
74Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPRoeder Cartage1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4
75Satellite Comm.Panic Dash/WPBBiometric Auth.E-ManifestT-4BPRoeder Cartage1.1-1.4,2.1-2.3,,2.8,2.10-2.12,2.14,,3.2-3.4

A.3.3 Operational Description of Scenario

Transport Services and Quality Services had used the satellite system extensively before and during the actual FOT. They both use the system for positioning, daily messaging, and operations. Roeder Cartage was a new user of the satellite system for the purposes of this FOT.

Driver identification was performed with the Biometric Login feature for all participants in this scenario. The drivers had to login using their fingerprint and smartcard after each time the tractor was started or had been disabled.

All three carriers had wired and wireless panic buttons installed in their tractors. The panic buttons were only used during on site evaluations with the evaluators. The Wireless Vehicle Disable (WVD) was also used during these controlled tests with the evaluators in a controlled environment to disable the throttle of the tractor.

All trucks in this scenario also had the ability to perform electronic manifest. Dow utilized it with Transport Services shipping product to Nufarm in Illinois. BP utilized it with Roeder Cartage on runs to Evans Chemical in Waterloo. BP was not able to utilize it with Quality due to consignee Eli Lily being unable to accommodate this test at the last moment.

A.4 Scenario 4 - Truckload Explosives

Scenario 4a with R&R Trucking involved 12 truckload explosive delivery vehicles, delivering Class 1.1 - 1.6, Explosives. The loads were delivered using dedicated trucks with dedicated routes. The routes are based out of Charlestown, Indiana (or Augusta GA in the summer) with deliveries in New York, New Jersey, and Illinois. Other routes are based out of Joplin Missouri with deliveries into three cities within Texas. The technologies installed per truck are listed later in Table A-8.

Scenario 4b with Dyno Transportation involved 13 truckload explosive delivery vehicles, delivering Class 1.1 - 1.6, Explosives. The routes were based out of Joplin Missouri with deliveries in New York, New Jersey, and Illinois. The technologies installed per truck are listed later in Table A-9.

A.4.1 Participants

ScenarioVehiclesShipperCarrierConsigneePublic Sector Agencies
4a12Orica USAR&R TruckingOrica USAIllinois State Police
4b13Dyno NobelDyno TransportationOrica USACalifornia Highway Patrol

Orica USA is the world's leading supplier of commercial explosives and blasting technology. It is a publicly-owned Australian chemical company employing approximately 8,000 personnel in 35 countries. The company's operations are divided into four main business areas - Mining Services, Chemicals, Consumer Products, and Agricultural Chemicals.

The company's main markets are the mining, quarrying, and construction industries. Its product range are divided into broad segments such as initiating systems, ammonium nitrate, bulk explosives, packaged explosives, and blasting services.

Orica USA was the shipper in 4a as well as the consignee on products flowing into their facility from Dyno.

R&R Trucking was established in 1988 as a munitions carrier for the U.S. government. Its main function was to handle dedicated runs for the Department of Defense (DoD). In 1997, R&R Trucking was approved by DOE to transport radioactive materials.

R&R companies specialize in the over-the-road transportation of military munitions, commercial explosives, and radioactive materials. R&R has 15 terminals located across the United States, with its corporate location near Joplin, MO where centralized dispatch is performed. Over-the-road shipments of commercial explosives are typically delivered to blasting sites and bin storage.

Dyno Nobel is one of the world's leading manufacturers of commercial explosives and initiation systems. Dyno Nobel is organized into four business areas: Dyno Nobel America (DNNA), Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific (DNAP), Dyno Nobel Europe (DNE), and the newly formed Dyno Nobel Latin America (DNLA).

Dyno Nobel is the only U.S. manufacturing location for nitroglycerin dynamites. It also produces emulsions and slurries. The manufacturing plant, which employs about 270 people, is located three miles southwest of Carthage, MO.

Dyno Nobel Transportation, Inc. is the private fleet transportation service for Dyno Nobel which operates a manufacturing facility directly across the street in Carthage, MO. Dyno Nobel Transportation primarily transports Class 1.1 through 1.5 explosives, and detonator shipments, originating in Carthage, MO throughout the United States and Canada.

Dyno of Lincoln, California was the consignee originally set up for this test. This run was extremely limited due to seasonal loads and planning.

State agency support was tested with Illinois State Police for R&R trucking.

Technologies Tested

The following provides the technologies that were tested in this scenario.

  • Wireless Satellite Communications (w/GPS)
  • Driver Authentication with Biometrics and Smart Cards
  • Electronic Supply Chain Manifest (ESCM)
  • Intelligent Onboard Computers (OBC)
    • Remote Vehicle Disabling Dispatcher or Parameter Set
    • Remote Lock and Unlock of Cargo Door Lock
  • Panic Button in Dash
  • Panic Button Wireless/remote
    • Remote Vehicle Disabling
    • Remote Emergency Notification
  • Electronic Cargo Seals
  • Untethered Trailer Tracking
  • Routing and Geofenced Mapping Software

A.4.2 Technologies by Truck

Tables A-8 and A-9 present the specific technologies that were installed on each of the 25 trucks that will be tested in this scenario. The suite of technologies are mapped to the technology tier described earlier as well as the functional requirements that were addressed.

A.4.3 Operational Description of Scenario

R&R and Dyno Transportation had used the satellite system extensively before and during the actual FOT. They both use the system for positioning, daily messaging, and operations. R&R also had the new capability to geofence some of their standard routes, which was also evaluated.

Driver identification was performed with the Biometric Login feature for all participants in this scenario. The drivers had to login using their fingerprint and smartcard after each time the tractor was started or had been disabled.

All three carriers had wired and wireless panic buttons installed in their tractors. The panic buttons were only used during on site evaluations with the evaluators. The Wireless Vehicle Disable (WVD) was also used during these controlled tests with the evaluators in a controlled environment to disable the throttle of the tractor.

All trucks in this scenario also had the ability to do electronic manifest. Orica utilized it with R&R shipping product to Scenica in Illinois. Dyno utilized it with R&R on runs to Orica in Indiana.

R&R had onboard computers (OBC) installed on their tractors. The functionality of these OBC's for loss of signal disabling and OTA disabling were tested on site at R&R in a controlled environment during the evaluation testing. The OBC also controlled the remote door unlocking device was used on daily runs from Charlestown to Joplin.

Table A-8. Technologies per Truck on Scenario 4a
TruckTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTierShipperCarrierFunctional Requirements
76SatellitePanic Dash/WPB/WVDBio Auth.E-ManifestOBC  T-5OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.4,2.1-2.4,2.6,2.8,2.10-2.14,3.2-3.4
77SatellitePanic Dash/WPB/WVDBio Auth.E-ManifestOBC  T-5OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.4,2.1-2.4,2.6,2.8,2.10-2.14,3.2-3.4
78SatellitePanic Dash/WPB/WVDBio Auth.E-ManifestOBC  T-5OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.4,2.1-2.4,2.6,2.8,2.10-2.14,3.2-3.4
79SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-Manifest Elec. Seal T-6OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.5,2.1-2.4,2.6, 2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
80SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-Manifest Elec. Seal T-6OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.5,2.1-2.4,2.6, 2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
81SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-Manifest Elec. Seal T-6OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.5,2.1-2.4,2.6, 2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
82SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-Manifest Elec. Seal T-6OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.5,2.1-2.4,2.6, 2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
83SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-Manifest Elec. Seal T-6OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.5,2.1-2.4,2.6, 2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
84SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-Manifest Elec. Seal T-6OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.5,2.1-2.4,2.6, 2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
85SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-Manifest Elec. Seal T-6OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.5,2.1-2.4,2.6, 2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
86SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-Manifest Elec. Seal T-6OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.5,2.1-2.4,2.6, 2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
87SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-Manifest Elec. Seal T-6OricaR&R Truck1.1-1.5,2.1-2.4,2.6, 2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
       Geo-Map  R&R Truck1.1-1.5,2.1-2.4,2.6, 2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4

Table A-9. Technologies per Truck on Scenario 4b
TruckTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTechnologiesTierShipperCarrierFunctional Requirements
88SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestUnteth Trailer Tr.T-5DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3,2.5, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
89SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestUnteth Trailer Tr.T-5DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3,2.5, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
90SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestUnteth Trailer Tr.T-5DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3,2.5, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
91SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestUnteth Trailer Tr.T-5DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3,2.5, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
92SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestUnteth Trailer Tr.T-5DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3,2.5, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
93SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestUnteth Trailer Tr.T-5DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3,2.5, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
94SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestUnteth Trailer Tr.T-5DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3,2.5, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
95SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestUnteth Trailer Tr.T-5DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3,2.5, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
96SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestUnteth Trailer Tr.T-5DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3,2.5, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
97SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestUnteth Trailer Tr.T-5DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3,2.5, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
98SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestWVDT-4DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
99SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestWVDT-4DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4
100SatellitePanic Dash/WPBBio Auth.E-ManifestWVDT-4DynoDyno Trans1.1-1.5,2.1-2.3, ,2.10-2.12,2.14,3.2-3.4

Lastly, Dyno Transportation had 10 trailers with tethered and untethered trailer tracking units. These trailers were of varying manufacturers and were spread out through their footprint of delivery locations.



 
 
Connect with us
FMCSA's Contact Us  FMCSA's Facebook page

Feedback | Privacy Policy | USA.gov | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Accessibility | OIG Hotline | Web Policies and Important Links | Site Map | Plug-ins

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 • 1-800-832-5660 • TTY: 1-800-877-8339 • Field Office Contacts