|
[Federal Register: April 13, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 71)]
[Notices]
[Page 18727-18728]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13ap07-110] ------------------------------------------------------------------ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket Nos. FMCSA-98-4334, FMCSA-00-7363, FMCSA-00-7918, FMCSA-02-
13411] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Renewals; Vision AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of final disposition. ------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: FMCSA previously announced its decision to renew the
exemptions from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations for 28 individuals. FMCSA has statutory authority to
exempt individuals from the vision requirement if the exemptions
granted will not compromise safety. The Agency has reviewed the
comments submitted in response to the previous announcement and
concluded that granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety
that will be equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety
maintained without the exemptions for these commercial motor vehicle
(CMV) drivers. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Chief, Physical
[[Page 18728]] Qualifications Division, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room 8301,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Access You may see all the comments online through the Document Management
System (DMS) at http://dmses.dot.gov. Background Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
for a 2-year period if it finds "such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that
would be achieved absent such exemption." The statute also allows the
Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period. The comment
periods ended on March 16, and March 22, 2007. Discussion of Comments FMCSA received two comments in these proceedings. The comments were
considered and discussed below. Ms. Sachau believes that the approval or renewal of vision
exemptions does not take into account the issue of safety on the road
and granting exemptions only makes the roads much more dangerous. A review of each record for safety while driving with the
respective vision deficiencies over the past two years indicates each
applicant continues to meet the vision exemption standards. To evaluate
the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA considered not only the
medical reports about the applicants' vision, but also their driving
records and experience with the vision deficiency. To qualify for an
exemption from the vision standard, FMCSA requires a person to present
verifiable evidence that he or she has driven a commercial vehicle
safely with the vision deficiency for 3 years. Recent driving
performance is especially important in evaluating future safety,
according to several research studies designed to correlate past and
future driving performance. Results of these studies support the
principle that the best predictor of future performance by a driver is
his/her past record of crashes and traffic violations. Copies of the
studies may be found at docket number FMCSA-98-3637. Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates) expressed
opposition to FMCSA's policy to grant exemptions from the FMCSR,
including the driver qualification standards. Specifically, Advocates:
(1) Objects to the manner in which FMCSA presents driver information to
the public and makes safety determinations; (2) objects to the Agency's
reliance on conclusions drawn from the vision waiver program; (3)
claims the Agency has misinterpreted statutory language on the granting
of exemptions (49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315); and finally (4) suggests
that a 1999 Supreme Court decision affects the legal validity of vision
exemptions. The issues raised by Advocates were addressed at length in 64 FR
51568 (September 23, 1999), 64 FR 66962 (November 30, 1999), 64 FR
69586 (December 13, 1999), 65 FR 159 (January 3, 2000), 65 FR 57230
(September 21, 2000), and 66 FR 13825 (March 7, 2001). We will not
address these points again here, but refer interested parties to those
earlier discussions. Conclusion The Agency has not received any adverse evidence on any of these
drivers that indicates that safety is being compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 28 renewal applications, FMCSA renews the Federal
vision exemptions for Henry Ammons, Jr., Michael D. Archibald, Robert
D. Bonner, Howard K. Bradley, Kirk G. Braegger, Ambroiso E. Calles,
David S. Carman, Jose G. Cruz, Everett A. Doty, Cedric E. Foster, Glen
T. Garrabrant, Donald J. Goretski, Harry P. Henning, Christopher L.
Humphries, Alan L. Johnston, Ralph J. Miles, Dennis I. Nelson, William
R. New, Rance A. Powell, Shannon E. Rasmussen, James R. Rieck, Thomas
C. Rylee, Stanley B. Salkowski, III., Garfield A. Smith, Michael G.
Thomas, William H. Twardus, Henry L. Walker, and Ronald Watt. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each renewal
exemption will be valid for 2 years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA.
The exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was
granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. Issued on: April 6, 2007.
Larry W. Minor,
Acting, Associate Administrator, Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E7-6999 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
|
